Archive for May 2011
But this is why you can’t rely on liberal blogs, either…
Firedog Lake says Sarah Palin “fired” Randy Scheunemann as her “foreign policy adviser.”
With all respect to Jane Hamsher (pictured at right), the creator and curator of Firedog Lake, what’s the source for “fired”?
All I’ve seen is a Politico story in which Ben Smith quotes SarahPac treasurer Tim Crawford as saying,
“Randy flat out said, ‘We can’t give you the time.'”
Doesn’t that sound more like Scheunemann and his colleague Michael Goldfarb of Washington lobbying firm Orion Strategies
just flat out quit because they no longer fancied Sarah’s 2012 prospects?
Who says they were fired? Did anyone call Orion to ask? Did a Palin spokesman even claim that Sarah fired them?
Apparently not. But a Firedog Lake blogger using the pseudonym “Edward Teller” stated it as fact.
This is what bothers me about the whole blogging thing–not to mention twittering, which is even worse: there is no accountability. Anyone can say pretty much anything they want, with no downside. Yes, this allows for the free expression of opinion, a vital part of our democracy, but it also permits statements that purport to be fact, (i.e. “Palin Fires Scheunemann”) to be disseminated as fact–in this case, by a pseudonymous blogger–even though they lack any factual basis.
This enables Palinists to turn around and argue, with some validity, that those of us who haven’t drunk the Kool-Aid play fast and loose with the truth.
Where does accountability lie?
Should Firedog Lake require “Edward Teller” to document his claim that Sarah fired Scheunemann?
Or should the site just post whatever it deems politically correct?
* * *
I spent a good part of my day today wading through “Author Queries” from the production editor at Random House/Crown.
This was after two preliminary edits, an edit by my editor at Crown, an edit by a copy editor, and a legal review. Even after all that, the production editor pointed out that on page 61 I wrote that when Sarah first approached a possible campaign manager before her run for mayor of Wasilla in 1996, she said “her main goal was to build more bike paths in the city.” Yet on the next page I wrote, “Sarah focused the secular aspects of her campaign on two issues: closing hours for local bars and liberalization of Alaska’s already lenient gun laws.”
The production editor queried me: “What about the bike paths?”
That’s what editors do: ask questions, and require that inconsistencies be resolved. No published author could survive without them. No website that depends on unpaid blog posts can afford them.
In this case, the production editor’s query caused me to make a few calls and send a few emails, in order to confirm that what I’d assumed was correct: Sarah forgot all about bike paths once she found she had sexier issues to run on.
But the query–after hundreds of prior queries and comments about my manuscript–made me do yet another day of homework.
I don’t mean to criticize amateur bloggers, but because they aren’t getting paid–much less by a multinational publisher such as Bertelsmann/Random House/Crown–they aren’t going to have a cadre of skilled editors at their disposal.
Thus: “Sarah fired Scheunemann.”
Although there’s no evidence that she did. And–given her freefall in recent months–there’s much circumstantial evidence to suggest that Scheunemann and Goldfarb were the rats who jumped from Sarah’s sinking ship, and that Disneyphobe Schweizer was the mouse she lured on to replace them.
My plea to bloggers of all political persuasions: Just because you wish it were so, please don’t state it as fact without knowing that it is.
Looks Like Another Charity Could Lose Money on Sarah Tonight
Fresh from her debacle at Colorado Christian University last night, Sarah will be in Point Clear, Alabama tonight to keynote a fundraiser for the “Exceptional Foundation of Baldwin County,” a nonprofit that helps people with mental and physical handicaps.
It’s unclear how much Sarah is charging the nonprofit for her appearance, but given an opportunity to say she was not charging the group, one of the organizers declined to do so, saying only that he “would not disclose costs for the event.”
But what is clear is that Point Clear residents won’t exactly be flocking to the local Marriott to hear the speech. “We don’t have quite the crowd we might have hoped for,” an organizer said, adding that tickets were still available, even as of this afternoon.
Tomorrow’s headline? “A Fallen Star Flopped in Alabama Last Night”
Joe v. Breitbart Twitterspat
I had an amusing little Twitter dustup with Breitbart last evening. He’s a bully and a blowhard, two types that ripple the normally zen-calm waters of my soul.
If these lefties are so convinced Obama’s gonna be reelected, why the high-level coordinated agitprop on what coulda been cool victory lap?
Oh, go lick Sarah’s Naughty Monkeys. Your followers were the worst filth I heard from last summer when I lived next door
You don’t think your living-next-doorness was creepiest creep job since @lizardoid‘s amazing ponytail of political confusion?
Nope. It was the practice of journalism. I invaded nobody’s privacy. Read THE ROGUE before judging.
Your book ‘The Last Brother: The Rise and Fall of Teddy Kennedy (1993)’ helped turn me from left to right, @joemcginniss! I swear! Thanks!
If that’s all it took, you weren’t very committed. But glad it did: I’d be embarrassed if you shared my political views
Sarah Puts the “Jerk” into “Knee-Jerk”
Colorado TV station leads coverage of Palin speech with:
“Palin leaves out Obama during remarks on bin Laden”
Story here
Overflow crowd also heard Boykin described as “war hero.” Well, maybe a hero of the War on Sanity.
All I can say is those Colorado Christians got what they deserved for paying to hear it.
“Organizers said the event raised $40,000 for the Tragedy Assistance Program for Survivors (TAPS.)”
But was that before or after they paid Sarah her $100,000 fee?
Sarah and Jerry Boykin Share Stage at Colorado Christian U.//UPDATE//UPDATE 1.1
The Colorado Independent offers a fine preview of this “patriotic/Christian” event.
Conservatives4Palin site promised live streaming, but all it does is crash my browser.
Probably God telling me not to bother paying attention.
Even God must have limits when it comes to Sarahspeak.
UPDATE:
Jason Salzman at http://bigmedia.org writes that “neither Boykin nor Palin is going to discuss Islam,” and says: “She and Boykin should be asked the question that the organizer of tonight’s event posed but refused to answer, ‘Can a good Muslim be a good American?'”
Don’t hold your breath for either the question or answer. Although I think we know that if they were honest, both Palin and Boykin would have to answer, “No.” Their God is for evangelical Christian dominionists only. It’s not a big tent. Leave your shoes and rationality at the door before entering. But bring your guns, willful ignorance, intolerance and cross-hair maps. Donations to the cause gratefully accepted–especially by Sarah.
UPDATE 1.1
ABC News’ Claton Sandell reports from Lakewood, Colo.:
Sarah Palin gave passing praise to President Obama’s “decisive leadership” in the operation to kill Osama bin Laden, though in a speech here Monday night the former Alaska governor and vice presidential candidate did not once use Obama’s name.
“We want to thank our president,” Palin said, but then she quickly shifted focus to the previous administration for having laid the groundwork.
“We thank President Bush for having made the right calls to set up this victory,” Palin told a cheering crowd.
So Sarah mentioned Bush by name, but not Obama. One thing about people devoid of class: they’re consistent.
Hey, tomorrow is a new day. And Sarah will get up in the morning and realize that she’ll have to live with herself throughout it.
No wonder–as I report in THE ROGUE–she used to come home when she was mayor of Wasilla and go to bed at 4 p.m. with a box of chocolates and a handful of celebrity picture magazines.
Living with that self for sixteen hours a day would exhaust any of us.
The Girl Can’t Help It: Nastiness & Pettiness Form Sarah’s Core//UPDATE 1.1
Even knowing that it was the right thing to do–both from a standpoint of simple decency and for her own self-interest–Sarah Palin last night could not bring herself to congratulate President Obama.
On Twitter, she thanked “American men and women in uniform.”
On Facebook, she added “our intelligence services.”
But for President Obama, Commander-in-Chief of U.S. military and intelligence forces, nary a word.
She’s just too mean-spirited and resentful. It’s in unguarded moments that character–or lack of same–most often reveals itself.
First, after the Giffords shooting and again last night, Sarah inadvertently gave us a glimpse of what passes for her heart.
It ain’t pretty.
The Washington Post reported yesterday that when Sarah appeared at the MSNBC party after the White House Correspondents dinner, “Invariably, onlookers whispered to their friends: ‘Isn’t she pretty? Isn’t she nice?‘”
Answers?
No, and no.
UPDATE:
Even Rush Limbaugh was able to say what needs to be said: “Thank God for president Obama.”
Snarky Sarah has painted herself into another lonely corner by refusing to give the president credit for the successful Bin Laden operation.
UPDATE 1.1
Limbaugh now says he was being sarcastic, which makes him every bit as horrid as I always thought he was. Let’s see what Sarah says tonight at the “Honor the Troops” event at Colorado Christian U.
For Bin Laden it was Abbottabad as it gets: also for Sarah Palin
As NYTimes and every other news outlet in the world reports:
President Obama said that on Sunday, a small team of U.S. operatives launched a “targeted assault’’ on a compound in the Pakistani city of Abbottabad where months of intelligence work had established that Mr. Bin Laden was living. Mr. Bin Laden was killed after a firefight, and the troops took custody of his body.
This is abbottabad as it gets for Sarah, too. Especially because, as President Obama reminded us tonight, Islam is not our enemy.
That crackpot ex-general Sarah’s sharing the stage with later today at Colorado Christian University says just the opposite.
The space between Sarah’s rock and hard place just got a whole lot smaller. She lamely tweeted last night:
Thank you, American men and women in uniform. You are America’s finest and we are all so proud. Thank you for fighting against terrorism.
It was with President Obama as commander-in-chief that American forces achieved what they’d never been able to achieve under George W. Bush. Obama had the tact and good grace not to continually emphasize how much effort was still going into the hunt for bin Laden, but as last night’s announcement demonstrated, that didn’t mean it wasn’t happening.
The wise man or woman doesn’t brag about what he or she intends to accomplish. Instead, after the fact, he or she credits others for the success.
Make no mistake: this was America’s most smashing success of the 21st century. That it puts egg on Sarah’s face is the least of it.
But the egg is there. U.S. soldiers killed America’s most dangerous enemy. And Barack Obama was commander-in-chief when it happened.
Sarah can tweet all the thanks she wants to American men and women in uniform.
But her failure to credit their commander-in-chief shows her up as the shallow, petty self-promoter she is.